![]() If you are not yet familiar with the algorithm, I would highly encourage you to check references and before continuing, as my intent with this post is to provide you with a visualization tool for the algorithm's 3D case. When it comes to the algorithm itself and its possible optimizations, many people have succeeded in explaining it in a much less abstract fashion. Most people who learn about GJK soon come to face the general consensus that the original paper is, in fact, very mathematically dense - almost unnecessarily so. ![]() In it, the authors describe an efficient algorithm for computing the Euclidean distance between a pair of convex set of points. Luckily, a lot of people have concerned themselves with finding exactly that answer.Ī Fast Procedure for Computing the Distance Between Complex Objects in Three-Dimensional Space is a paper on the field of robotics and automation by Gilbert, Johnson and Keerthi (or GJK for short). But I do care about how a seemingly complex task like checking for collisions for all 3D objects in a scene of a game running at 60 FPS can possibly be achieved. Now, I don't actually mind if you don't like sugar in your coffee. You can drink it without it, but having it just makes it so much better. Detecting collisions is to interactivity what sugar is to coffee. Surely we can make a game which doesn't need any type of collision detection whatsoever, however most games do need to detect whether an object has come into contact with another. Therefore, the total time complexity is O(n * f(n) m * g(n)).īoth of these functions can be implemented in many different ways.Collision detection is perhaps one of the most ubiquitous features of any game engine. Let f(n) be the time complexity of selecting a minimum and let g(n) be the time complexity of the update operation. It is easy to see that during the execution, this minimum is selected exactly n times and the distance values is updated exactly m (number of edges) times, because we do it once for every edge. Also during iteration a vertex v which has the minimum value of d(s, v) is selected from vertices in V \ X, and the distance value for all neighbours of v is updated. Note that there are n (number of nodes) iterations of the main loop, because during each iteration one vertex is moved to the set X. The time complexity of Dijkstra algorithm is as follows. This is true because we are dealing only with non negative edges and this vertex has to have the minimal value of d(s, v) from all vertices in V \ X. Note that for the Dijkstra algorithm the following invariant holds: As long as V \X in not empty, there exists a vertex v in V \ X such that d(s, v) has already assigned its final value. Move v to X and for each edge (v, u) such that v is in V \ X, update the current distance to u, i.e., do d(s, u) = min(d(s, u), d(s, v) w(v, u)), where w(v, u) is the length of the edge from v to u. Let v be a vertex in V \ X such that d(s, v) is minimal from all such vertices. Then as long as V \ X in not empty (i.e., there is at least one vertex v for which d(s, v) is not already computed), repeat the following step. Initially V \ X is empty and initialize d(s, s):= 0 and d(s, v):= infinity for all v != s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |